This artical is basically explains both the
power of the purse side of funding the wars and the
commander and cheif and his role as the president and commander of all our military branches. One argument is that yes, the president is the commander and chief of the military, however, congress holds the power of the purse. In other words they have a say in what wars will be funded and for how long. So they also can influence war policies simply by what they will fund and what they won't fund. An example of this was the vietnam war. Congress chose to over rule President Regan. Others agrue that the american people elected the president and one of his roles is commander and chief of the military. So they are saying that we should let him make the decisions on war funding and policies and not have congress involved.
power of the purse/
commander and chief
My belief in this is that we should have the power of the purse when it comes to making war decisions because we can't have another Hitler. The President would get currupted with power and start to make wrong decisions that people might not even want. The consitution was made up for "We the People for the People" and congress stresses that because they work for us and not one guy. They want what we are going to want.
Issue #1 war dollars also believes in the power of the purse.
Issue 3
Issue 2